This spring semester, Penn State’s Libraries’ Publishing and Curation Services will launch a series of workshops dedicated to publishing tools.
The first workshop will be an Introduction to Scalar, an easy-to-use, online publishing tool and will take place on February 13, from 11 am until noon.
You can find more information as well as the registration form here: https://digitallab.psu.edu/dhguide/event-registration/?ee=2
I am leading this workshop so clearly, you should attend!
Update: We have now officially launched our spring series of workshops. You can find more information here.
Category Archives: Digital Humanities
WSFH Conference Update
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to let you know that you can now find a link to my presentation at the WSFH conference on Penn State’s Digital Lab website.
This website is Penn State’s DH guide and features, among other things, all the DH projects happening at the university.
Interview With Katherine Rowe
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to let you know that the interview I did with Dawn Taylor (PhD candidate in comparative literature) of Prof. Katherine Rowe is now online. Katherine Rowe is an English professor at Bryn Mawr College and came to Penn State last October to talk about how she “uses digital humanities to explore the rhetoric of scholarly walking in the context of a small set of virtual Shakespearean locales”.
Enjoy.
Mapping Decadence: Conference
Good morning,
WSFH has finally uploaded the videos of the different panels that were recorded live and webcast during the conference.
If you want to hear more about my project, you can now watch me talk about it.
David Del Testa (Bucknell) was the commentator. You can find the video of his comments on the presentations here.
If you have any questions, please feel free to comment on this post.
Mapping Decadence
Two weeks ago, I attended the WSFH conference (Western Society for French History) in Atlanta. I organized a panel about Digital Humanities. I entitled it “Humanities in a Digital Age: Using Digital Tools for Research and Teaching”. The panel was webcast and recorded. I will put a link to the video as soon as it will be available.
My own talk was called Mapping Decadence:Visualizing Relationships Between Writers and Publishers. I will talk about it and publish it soon.
ThatCamp Philly: when is the next one?
I had a great time at ThatCamp Philly. This was my first ThatCamp ever, and I learned so much. Everyone was really nice and helpful. The amenities were pretty nice, too. In the morning, “Angels” helped us set up the software for the workshops we were attending. The organizers provided tea, coffee, sodas, water, and snacks all day long (people do need their caffeine). And for lunch, participants could sign up to go to a specific restaurant with 5-6 people. It was a great way for attendees to get to meet and talk to new people outside of the camp. Other conference organizers should take note!
As I already said on Twitter: thank you so much for such a great weekend.
Day 1
Friday was devoted to workshops. The three morning sessions included: 1. Mapping Your World: Exploring Free Web-Based Tools to Map and Visualize Your Data and Tell Your Story to the World (Scott Rutzmoser, Lehigh University), 2. WordPress Essentials (Michael Tedeschi, Interactive Mechanics), 3. Video Editing on the Cheap (Nicole Scalessa, Library Company). I attended the one on mapping, since my digital humanities project involves mapping the social networks and relationships of French decadent writers and their publishers (this will be for another blog post). For the moment, my map is hosted on cartoDB, but thanks to this workshop I discovered ArcGIS, which seems like a better fit for what I want to do with my map. I am now considering transferring my data to ArcGis, and I have to thank this workshop for the discovery.
The second set of morning workshops were as follows: 1. WordPress Beyond the Basics (Michael Tedeschi, Interactive Mechanics), 2. Wikipedia 101 (Mary Mark Ockerbloom), 3. Intro to Programming with the Processing Language (Katherine Lynch, Temple University).
I attended the one on programming and learned how to create circles, rectangles, and shapes that were changing colors.
In the afternoon, the workshops included: 1. Wikipedia Edit-A-Thon (Mary Mark Ockerbloom), 2. The Anatomy of a Project: project design for Digital Humanities (Delphine Khanna and Matt Shoemaker, Temple University), 3. Hands-on Programming Demonstration with the Processing Language (Katherine Lynch, Temple University). I decided to take another shot at programming, thinking that a hands-on demonstration might help me understand things better.
Day 2
As I wrote in my previous post, ThatCamps don’t have a formal schedule for Day 2. Participants are asked to suggest sessions ahead of time and then get to vote for the ones they would be interested in seeing organized and attending. That’s why, when I arrived on Saturday morning, I was given stickers. There were posters with the names of the discussion sessions that had been suggested on the ThatCamp Philly website. We were then asked to affix stickers to posters for the sessions we were interested in. To help us choose, there were 30 seconds presentations about the prospective sessions by the people who proposed them. At 9:15, the voting was over and it was time for the organizers to decide on the schedule. To make sure people would benefit from all of the discussions, it was decided that there would be one note-taker per session. The notes would then be shared on Google documents. That way, I was able to know what had been discussed in the sessions I could not attend. The topics ranged from DH in the classroom and visual ethics to how to curate digital exhibits.
I really enjoyed the fact that this “unconference” favored discussion so heavily. People came in with their questions, their issues, their solutions, their projects, or asked for advice and opinions. There was no judging; just healthy discussions. I had such a great time, learned so much, and met such great people. I can’t wait to go back or help organize another ThatCamp one day!
ThatCamp Philly
I am leaving today for Philadelphia to attend my first ThatCamp ever (and I am sure, not the last).
So what is ThatCamp?
It is an open, very often free or inexpensive meeting where humanists and technologists meet, discuss, learn, build together workshops and sessions proposed on the spot.
At ThatCamp Philly, Friday will be workshops day. In the morning, you can either learn more about mapping (so excited about that), learn how to video edit, understand more about WordPress or Wikipedia, and discover what Programming means with the Processing language. And that’s just for the morning!
In the afternoon, you can participate in a Wikipedia Edit-A-thon, learn how to write a project proposal for a digital humanities project, and attend a hands-on demonstration using the Processing language.
On Saturday morning, between 8.30 and 9.15am, attendees will vote on the sessions that have been proposed on the website beforehand. The most popular topics or most commonly shared problems and questions will be scheduled for the day. This process really leaves the attendees the power to decide what they want the conference to be like. The sessions are informal discussions and working group meetings, which is very different from any conference I have attended before and I can’t wait to see what it looks like.
A case against voting on DHThis
Yesterday, at 11 am EST, a new website called DHThis launched. DHThis describes itself as “the first entirely crowdsourced outlet for digital humanities.” The idea behind it is that people can register for free on the website, submit articles, and link to blog posts that they have written, putting their work before the DHThis community. Then, users have the opportunity to upvote or downvote articles. The ones with the most votes will appear on the front page of the site; the least liked will disappear after a few days.
I strongly dislike this voting concept. Let’s imagine that I post something I wrote and fifteen users downvote it, without commenting on it. As an early career scholar, I do not yet have the benefit of an established reputation. An overwhelmingly critical response to a piece might have a negative impact on my professional reputation, with possible long-term consequences. And I don’t believe that’s what the digital humanities are about. I imagine it more as an open, collaborative community, which, to me, is not represented in this voting system.
I am also unclear as to how long the articles can remain on the homepage. Does that depend on the number of votes they receive? What if an article gets twice the number of votes as any other article? Will it stay on the homepage forever?
Alternately, the articles featured on the homepage could change daily or twice a week. They would be randomly chosen from among the articles submitted by the users. It would not depend on a vote.
Ultimately, if I go to DHThis, it won’t be to cast a vote but to learn about what people are doing and what is happening in the world of digital humanities in the hopes of broadening my knowledge.